Welcome to the RotoBaller NCAA March Madness’Total Bracket Prediction’.
The 68-team field is officially set, and I hope you were fortunate enough to have your favorite school make it. But in the event that you solely root to get one university, as I do with UNLV, then you will be seeing the championship without a dog in the fight. Don’t worry though! March Madness provides you with a chance to fill out a mount and compete against both friends and strangers in your quest for perfection.
Before I lead you since the conductor on this trip, let us make 1 thing abundantly clear. Your likelihood of creating a perfect mount are 9.2 quintillion to 1. To put that number into perspective, you’re just about as likely to have all these things happen during your lifetime. Want to be president? One in 10 million. Believe you’re the upcoming great actor? One in 1.5 million. Think of yourself a prospective medal-winning Olympic athlete? One in 662,000. While this is discouraging news for anybody trying to make history, there are ways to increase your chances if you stick to a perfect strategy. Check out Ronald Reagan. He found a way to achieve two of the three situations mentioned above. If he were a marginally greater swimmer, Reagan might have accomplished the impossible.
There are a few things you should actively be looking into when breaking your own bracket. For starters, Vegas is generally right. That doesn’t mean to take all of the favorites, but if you start picking too many underdogs from the opening round — particularly ones the public bettors have developed an incline towards, your mount can start dismantling itself right away. I’ve always found it to be successful to look for a couple of vital statistics in regards to both mid-major programs and your continuing top-seeded teams. Underdogs that could spring upsets usually concentrate on a few of the very same characteristics every season. You don’t have to do all of these, but the ability to not turn the ball over, stop offensive rebounds, force steals and shoot at a higher three-point percentage will likely be crucial. The notion is that if you’re able to restrict possessions for your opponent, you can neutralize some of those skill discrepancies which you might face. Vice versa, higher-seed teams (your leading apps ) need to prevent being sporadically dependant, should use their size to make offensive boards and need to find out a way to either force turnovers or never turn the basketball . It basically is the exact opposite approach of the mid-majors. In case the powerhouse teams can create more possessions for themselves, then it is going to be quite hard for poor programs to continue dancing in March. Without further ado, let’s dive into this bracket and model this thing from start to finish.
Read more here: http://www.fortoli.cn/?p=20976