Welcome to the RotoBaller NCAA March Madness’Total Bracket Prediction’.
The 68-team field is formally set, and that I hope you were fortunate enough to have your favourite college make it. But if you solely root for a single college, as I do with UNLV, then you will be watching the championship with no dog in the fight. Do not worry though! March Madness supplies you with a chance to fill out a mount and compete against both strangers and friends in your search for perfection.
Before I lead you since the conductor with this journey, let us make one thing abundantly clear. Your odds of creating a perfect bracket are 9.2 quintillion to 1. To put that number into perspective, you are nearly as likely to have each of these things occur during your lifetime. Want to become president? One in 10 million. Think you’re the next great celebrity? One in 1.5 million. Think of yourself a prospective medal-winning Olympic athlete? One in 662,000. While this is discouraging news for anybody trying to make history, there are strategies to increase your chances if you stick to a perfect strategy. Look at Ronald Reagan. He discovered a means to reach two of the three situations mentioned previously. If he had been a marginally better swimmer, Reagan could have achieved the impossible.
There are a few things you should consciously be looking into when breaking down your bracket. For starters, Vegas is generally perfect. That doesn’t mean to take all the favorites, but if you start picking a lot of underdogs in the opening round — particularly ones that the people bettors have developed an affinity towards, your bracket can start dismantling itself immediately. I have always found it to be successful to search for a few vital statistics in regards to the two mid-major programs and your perennial top-seeded teams. Underdogs that could spring upsets usually specialize in a few of the same characteristics every season. You do not need to do all these, but the capability to not turn over the ball, prevent offensive rebounds, force steals and take a high three-point percentage will be crucial. The idea is that if you can restrict possessions to your competitor, you can neutralize some of those skill discrepancies that you might confront. Vice versa, higher-seed teams (your top programs) need to avoid being three-point dependant, should use their size to make offensive boards and need to find out a way to force turnovers or never turn the basketball over. It essentially is the specific opposite strategy of this mid-majors. In case the powerhouse teams may create extra possessions for themselves, it is going to be quite hard for poor programs to continue dancing in March. Without further ado, let’s dive into this bracket and simulate this thing from begin to finish.
Read more here: http://www.fortoli.cn/?p=20976